Thoughts from a communications thinker and tinkerer
I’m really, really hoping that 2010 will see some innovation in research methods and technology, so it’s nice to see this ‘Everyday Lives’ ethnography app just launch for the iPhone already. I haven’t given it a spin yet but I’m not sure the features quite warrant the features just yet. I’ll keep you posted. You can download it here.
Posted in Research
Lyrics from Stereotype…
He’s just a stereotype
He drinks his age in pints
He has girls every night
He dosen’t really exist
This is sad I know. Going to The Specials on my birthday, on their 30th anniversary tour and drawing comparisons with the problems of research.
Posted in Research
Whilst only a very small group of people have the time or inclination to tell their friends on Facebook about an awesome Tweet they did relating to their latest wicked good Tumblr, it’s high likely that we will start to see many of these networks starting to clearly divide by class, age and most certainly function.
I’ve come across a few stats this week that show how some of the popular networks are evolving in terms of user profiles.
The NYT highlights that despite Myspace’s decline it still has virtually the same amount of visitors as Facebook in the US. However interestingly it isn’t age that divides these two Networks, but potentially class. Danah Boyd, Microsoft’s Social Media Researcher who conducted the study found the following:
‘During the 2006-2007 school year, conversations with high-school students began showing a trend of white, upper-class and college-bound teens migrating to Facebook –much like the crowd in the conference hall has. Meanwhile, less-educated and non-white teens were on MySpace. Ms. boyd noted that old-style class arrogance was also in view; the Facebook kids were quicker to use condescending language toward the MySpace kids’.
The next indicator comes from Business Week citing a study conducted by Anderson Analytics. The US study found the following:
Twitter users like news, restaurants, sports, politics, personal finance and religion, pop culture, music, movies, TV and reading.
- They’re more likely to buy books, movies, shoes and cosmetics online than the other groups.
- Twitterers are also entrepreneurial.
- They are more likely than others to use the service to promote their blogs or businesses.
- More likely to be employed part-time (16% vs. 11% average),
- An average income of $58,000, and average 28 followers and 32 other Twitterers they’re following. They’re not particularly attached to the site, though — 43% said they could live without Twitter.
MySpace users skew younger
- They’re more likely to have joined MySpace for fun and more likely to be interested in entertaining friends, humour and comedy, and video games.
- They’re less into exercise than any other social group but seek out parenting information more than any other.
- Their average income is the lowest, at $44,000, and they have an average of 131 connections.
- They’re more likely to be black (9%) or Hispanic (7%) than users of the other social sites. They are also more likely to be single (60%) and students (23%)
Facebook users
News, sports, exercise, travel, and home and garden skewed slightly higher than average
- They are more likely to be married (40%), white (80%) and retired (6%) than users of the other social networks.
- They have the second-highest average income, at $61,000, and an average of 121 connections.
Facebook users skew a bit older and are more likely to be late adopters of social media.
- But they are also extremely loyal to the site — 75% claim Facebook is their favourite site
Posted in Digital Strategy, Research
Mark Earls and Dr Alex Bentley have recently published this great article in Research Week discussing ‘How ideas spread?’ Not only is it another great view on ‘spreadability’ they highlight an interesting approach to research that may actually help us understand groups of people (we) and how they might spread our ideas. Earls and Bentley challenge traditional methods stating that they focus on individuals (me) and generally treat them as being isolated from the rest of the population and social influence.
So how do they define ‘We research’?
‘From asking individuals about themselves – who are poor witnesses to themselves and their behaviour – to instead asking them to play to their strengths in observing their peers’
It kind of makes perfect sense really. So much of what we do is still too focused on the me rather than the we, even though it is becoming more and more important to consider people’s extended networks. What does your brief look like as on example?
I have a kind of love hate relationship with research. Whilst it’s great to be enlightened and uncover something new or interesting that inspires you, it seems to be happening less and less. Unfortunately I find a lot of research I come across to be particularly unhelpful these days and extremely ubiquitous. The output rarely justifies the cost.
And here’s a case in point. In a recent post a study by Jack Trout and Kevin Clancy was cited from the Harvard Review, finding that only two categories of product – soft drinks and soap – were becoming more distinct, but the other 40 were homogenizing. The authors also found that only 7% out of 340 prime time ads monitored included what could be considered a ‘differentiating message’. Now there is a hell of a lot of research and ad dollars being wasted just to end up saying and sounding the same as each other.
Unfortunately research is being used more and more to validate rather than innovate, particularly in this current climate so it’s nice to see a refreshing and common sense approach to research that will hopefully help us understand social influence and how our ideas might spread.
Iain of Crackunit posted about this nice little touch to the shopping experience by the convenience store Co-op. Whether this collects valid, useable information is beside the point, at least I feel like they are trying to make me happy. Here’s his post.
In my opinion one of the best traits any planner can have is the ability to understand people from all walks of life and really see, sense and feel things from their point of view. And when I say understand I don’t just mean being able to describe their TGI definition. You need to have a real empathy and respect for them, irrespective of your preconceptions or what the data might tell you. It is always possible to find something endearing in any audience if you look hard and objectively enough.
Ironically our industry, despite employing interesting people, are generally from the same margin of society. And for people supposedly so open minded it’s surprising how easily judgments are made. I’m blogging about this because of a free project we are working on for a local drugs working group that highlighted a really interesting transition in people’s attitudes and behaviours towards an audience having spent time with them.
Under our guidance we have given this brief to all our junior members of the agency to answer. After giving them an outline brief there was the usual snap judgements about the lives and motivations of drug users and addicts. It was all very middle class and quite disappointing frankly. So in order to get them over this, open their minds and put them in a slightly uncomfortable position we set up a series of groups consisting of ex-addicts, drug workers and counsellors. It was up to the guys to ask some questions and get some real insight into the lives of drug users. After an uncomfortable start they began probing and developing some interesting relationships. I’d go as far as saying friendships. So good in fact they even went out for some drinks with them afterwards to probably ask more ‘informal’ questions.
By the end of the session there was a complete turnaround in how they viewed a group of people who are arguably in a completely different part of society, with vastly different life experiences. Not only did they have a real empathy for them, they developed a real enthusiasm for the cause. Well done guys, I can’t wait to see the work.
Image via
Breaking news flash, just delivered to my inbox. Apparently young people don’t follow the news as much adults. Yes, you heard it here first. OK, maybe second or third. But you can read the latest mind blowing research here.
It’s not in the report, but it’s also true that young people are in actual fact younger than old people. I interviewed my parents and my grandparents and it turned out we were all different ages. Would you Adam and Eve it!?!
I think I might start posting these pointless ‘insights’.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m fond of PR and I have a lot of respect for people in the industry – I have to. Other than the fact that my other half works in it; it’s also where I started my career. I would go as far as saying PR is a good place to start if you want to be a planner – although probably not something that will stand out on your CV to a prospective employer.
There are several reasons why it’s good. You develop an eye for a story, you hone your writing skills, you do you own research, you have to come up with your own strategy without the help of a planning department, you’re under pressure to come up with your own ideas without the help of a creative, you have to do you own media plans and you also have to actually role your sleeves up and implement all of this. Lee has written a good post on this before but I think it goes further than just being a good journalist.
So why do I have an issue with PR? (I’m excluding public affairs, CSR and lobbying from this as they’re completely different disciplines in my opinion) It’s essentially the reason why I got frustrated and moved in to planning. Out of all the marketing disciplines people in PR, more often than not, tend to be the ones with the least knowledge of brand strategy and are way behind others in terms of innovation.
Although this isn’t a great yardstick for measuring how innovative a profession is, you will be hard pressed to find many PR blogs out there that talk about anything other than how the Interweb is affecting the industry. No shit Sherlock!
Many proposals I see regarding the use of online are pretty staid. So despite the rhetoric I don’t believe that PR is the best discipline to manage your brand online just yet. Many, but not all are just using the same rules as they adhere to offline. They’ll tell me that any brand worth its salt should be on Myspace with no explanation as to how they would use it or why it’s even relevant. They will treat bloggers exactly the same as they would treat journalists, people just waiting to hear about a products wonderful new features and competitive price point. They will claim to be able to create buzz and influence opinion directly in forums with obviously no experience, as they are unfamiliar with the terms ‘advertising scum’ and ‘flaming’.
I get bored of the same tired old tactics, that are just that – a bunch of tactics, wheeled out for every client with no real strategy supporting them. You normally get a celebrity (that you will have no chance of actually using or they only have a very tenuous link to the brand). There will probably be a survey, a competition and maybe even an event thrown in. It’s not the tactics being used as such that annoys me, it’s more the thought that goes into the ideas. I very rarely see the same creative and strategic thinking that you get from people in other disciplines.
Some PR professionals are also great at using a number of power word and phrases that obviously proves they get it. My favourites being:
“We’re an agency that gets results”. Phew, good job we didn’t use that agency that doesn’t get results.
“As an agency we pride ourselves on effectiveness”. You mean you have a press cuttings service.
“We know how to manage your brand online”. Then how come when I asked if you use Instant Messenger did you say is that a good courier service? (This didn’t happen, but I thought it made this long rant a bit funnier).
“Here are our key messages….” No, they are the brand’s key messages, you’re just reading them back to me.
Then there are the same objectives on absolutely every proposal with no expansion as to what this means for the communications:
1. To raise awareness
2. To change perception
3. To deliver ROI
Of what, why and how? Ohhh, refer to the strategy you say. I’m sorry all I can see is a load of tactics and for your information, I don’t think Mr Motivator is a good idea. I’m sure he hasn’t been on TV for at least 15 years.
I do genuinely think PR has a major role to play in a brand’s communications mix and I’m not suggesting everyone in PR is incompetent, I just think the ones I’ve personally experienced recently are giving it a bad name.
I don’t think PR will ever have the position at the head of the table unless they can think more strategically and ensure it isn’t separate, second, or even non-existent to the idea they propose. They must understand how to use emerging media and not just that it’s out there. And finally I would like to see better, smarter, more involving ideas. Perhaps the pressure from clients to get column inches rather than a share of people’s conversations stops them from doing all of this, I don’t know? One thing is for sure, it is about having more than a little black book full of journo’s numbers.
Posted in Communications, Journalism, Objectives, Plannin, PR, Research, Strategy, Tactics, The weird world of agencies
I’ve been working on a few campaigns over the last year aimed at what I’ll call young working class people, who like a good time, but they’re often referred to as chavs as soon as the brief comes through the door. I’m sure that’s the same in many agencies full of proper folk. Now I love this post about liking your audience. I think it’s too easy to be cynical. We’re quick to make assumptions about people and the first thing we naturally do is to look at the bad side of people rather than the good side.
As a single parent bringing up two boys, if my Dad wanted a couple of pints down the local after football, he didn’t have much choice other than to take my brother and me with him. I remember nearly every Saturday afternoon being dragged down the pub, until I, well, wanted to go myself. This was a great experience, although I remember finding it boring at the time (my hair being ruffled was also quite annoying). And the reason being is you see the fun, jovial, good spirited side of a diverse group of people. The rough diamonds if you like. From now on if the cynic in me raises its ugly head I’ll be sure to remember the good old days.
Recent Comments