Ratings are overrated

Image

Ratings and ranking systems are a part of almost every industry these days. From finance and media to sport and music, people lap these things up.

I can’t stand them myself. In my humble opinion they make people behave all weird. Like moths attracted to a burning hot light bulb. They know it might end in 3rd degree burns, but they just can’t help themselves.

On the one hand ratings make a lot of sense. Rating things attempts to show what’s good and what’s bad and what’s popular and what’s not. This allows people and companies to make more informed decisions. The problem is they are easily manipulated and arguably driven by rather shady motivations.

Whether it’s buying the latest single, making a bet, an investment or spending marketing budget, various forms of ratings heavily influence what people do.

You only have to look at the financial crisis to highlight how pointless they are.

Millions of dodgy sub-prime mortgages were given goodratings by official organisations just to keep the money rolling in. This Time quote pretty much sums things up:

“But ratings also became a stamp of actuarial approval that often let investors and regulators skimp on their own due diligence”

Now I’m know financial whizz, I work in advertising, but how does USA have a perfect credit rating despite being one of the most in-debt countries in the world, coming a whisker away from defaulting?

Media buying around TV ratings is another example of how reality is distorted. Brands spend billions buying up the ad breaks of the highest rating shows. Now I’m not against TV advertising I just think it’s way over priced for its impact.

TV has never been a better medium for advertising the media agencies and networks will tell you. Ratings are up, and more and more people are watching TV (this is true). As a result one 30 second spot in The Voice will cost you $100K to ‘reach’ approximately 2m Australian.

Why do companies do it? It’s supposedly the quickest and easiest way to reach a lot of people with your gospel. Again this is fundamentally flawed.

It’s projected. It assumes that people are actually watching the ad. You only pay for the actual TARPs/GRPs I hear you say. Have you ever met anyone that actually has one of those mythical little boxes that records the sound of the show to check you have watched the ads – of course not, but that’s beside the point. And just because it’s recorded the sound it still does not mean I have watched the ad break let alone remembered it.

Marketers aren’t very good a observing their own behaviour. The front room is full of distractions. I could have checked my emails, sent a tweet, checked my Facebook account, played Angry Birds or God forbid spoke to my Wife, made a cup of tea or had a number two.

Media agencies are even peddling this point of view about time-shifted viewing not really affecting the situation; they are just watching more TV. Who does not fast forward ads on shows you have recorded? In fact there are so many ads on some shows I have to record it because it’s impossible to watch it at the set time.

Again not to say TV isn’t a good medium, just don’t always follow the high rating shows. There is a better way. The problem is that people don’t get sacked for creating TV ads to plonk in the highest rating shows. It’s not their fault if it doesn’t work, it must be the creative, and after all media buying and TV ratings is all scientific like. Well it’s not, it’s designed to keep people in Jags and I’m amazed how the industry just takes it.

Ratings completely mislead industries and make organisations take its eyes of the bigger problem and ultimately the prize. Australian networks are more interested in driving prime time ratings on one or two shows to sell ads than creating content people want to watch.

Brands and agencies spend way too much time and money trying to fill these breaks rather actually making stuff people want.

Ratings give people an overinflated confidence and should only be used as I guide. You need to ask the tough questions even if you can’t measure stuff 100%. Take them on face value and you will get fixated on the wrong goal.

Henry Jenkins on Transmedia and convergence culture

[Vimeo http://vimeo.com/4672634]

I particularly like his quote about George Orwell not getting it right in 1984. It’s more accurate to suggest that we are in fact watching Big Brother these days, rather than the other way round. A nice little articulation.

FYI I don’t think he is talking about the reality TV show either.

HT to Maschmeyer

Digital Lethargy

Does digital make us lazy? Have we lost the urge just to do stuff or stand up and speak out for what we believe in? Does digital give us the chance to dabble in something but not actually see it through?

Well there have been a few things lately that have made me think about digital lethargy. The point in which a person’s interest or involvement online isn’t mobilised into something that arguably has a greater influence and/or effect (it’s not a real post unless you have coined a term by the way). Perhaps it is political or merely something more fulfilling personally. Or maybe even a sale.

I criticise myself a lot for being too lazy. I have strong opinions about politics and the environment, but I don’t really do anything about it. I rarely read the paper properly anymore. I use Facebook instead of making an effort to go and visit friends and family. I go on many cool branded sites but rarely buy the product or even think differently about it, at least not consciously. And of course posting too much about things other people have said or done rather the things I have done or think.

Noah and the guys from Zeus Jones have written this and this respectively about how digital habits are manifesting themselves in traditional forms of media consumption/behaviour, which is an interesting concept in itself. Although not related to digital, John Mcure of Reverend and the Makers fame also wrote this in the Guardian that touches on people doing sod all politically. I particularly like this paragraph.

“Yet a deafening silence prevails, save for on soft issues that don’t require our leaders to remove the splinters of middle England’s fences from their derrieres. Bono talking hungry Africans is a safe issue. He’s a man they’re happy to do business with, borrow some cool from. Everyone agrees we should act. Comic Relief, Sport Aid? No brainers. A far cry from the counterculture radicals who so affected our broad thinking during the late 60s or even during the punk era.”

So praise be to god my dying belief in mankind was saved when I went to my first APG event in Sydney and Sam McLean from the not for profit Getup.org.au gave us a presentation on how they use digital to mobilise people around specific issues such as the environment or the price of fuel for example.

Now I think Getup is awesome and it is genuinely more than just an online petition site, which lets face it is the most lazy form of activism. It has 280,000 members. People create content for their campaigns for free and people donate money to pay for the media spend and launch it as a TV ad. They even organise ‘Getogethers’ across Australia that do influence policies at varying levels. Getup are a great example of how digital can be used cost effectively to create grassroots interests and participation, but more importantly how they turn that interest into something potent by using ‘old media’.

If you haven’t seen it yet, Getup is responsible for the following movie. And if you want to donate towards the media spend you can do it here.

Now I’m sort of going off course a bit but I will maintain the ramble. The rub for me on this is ‘what does this essentially mean for brands?’ I often hear it said, particularly in the alcohol market, that their respective audiences aren’t online. Which isn’t true, but what is true is why should someone bother to gather, ‘online or offline’, anywhere other than a pub for a bottle of lager? And that is where digital agencies are failing. Why would any self respecting lager drinker bother to jump through these hoops just win a fridge or hear about all of their exciting news via email? Do they really care enough to do what is being asked of them?

This to me is the part that clients want us to answer and is imperative if digital agencies are to play a greater role from a brand leadership perspective. Rather than throwing stats at them that say 21 – 35 year olds lager drinkers now consume x amount of Internet hours compared to TV, therefore we must do something in digital. We must be showing them how we can use digital in a way that is relevant for people’s relationship with that specific brand. How can we snap them out of this lethargy and create communications that are more than just forwarding an email on to a friend, entering a competition or signing up to a petition against global warming? How can we mobilise the masses and not just those who are motivated enough to play with the latest communication just because it’s cool and innovative? Perhaps there is a market for a digital, come experiential, come PR agency?

iTunes U

Sorry if this generates even more information overload for planners, but I think it’s worthwhile.

iTunes have just launched, iTunes U, ‘the campus that never sleeps’. You may have noticed it on your iTunes interface already? It’s basically 100s of free lectures from some top Universities in the US. I haven’t had the chance to have a good rummage, but there are a couple in there I’ve spotted that look interesting. Particuarly lectures from MIT’s comparative media studies course. Which features the fantastic Henry Jenkins.

You can read The Guardian’s article here.

I’ve made the front page…


…of Marketing Direct

This magazine normally sits in the pile of things I’ll flick through if I have the time and to be honest, I very rarely get to this one. But while I was having a sort out I caught sight of my name literally plastered all over the front page.

It’s a great piece of personalised DM in my opinion and to be honest I agree with most of it. I am the best planner ever, I am cool and I should be Prime Minister. I’m not sure about loving Southampton though, only parts of it.

Impressive, most impressive

This post is an amalgamation of a number of things I’ve been thinking about recently. Mainly based on books such as Herd, Convergence Culture, The Perfect Pitch, Brand Innovation Manifesto and The Economics of Attention, as well as other thoughts such as marketing enthusiasm and interestingness. My feeble attempt of simplifying all of this is to describe it as impressiveness. This is a scale if you like. All brands should honestly ask themselves how much do we actually impress people?

Brands impressing people might seem like a simple concept but few do it. Why? Impressing people isn’t as easy as it used to be. If Darth Vader was a planner he might of said brands today can’t just be impressive; they need to be most impressive.

Here is a list of the things brands should think about in order to impress people

1.Ask yourself objectively, how much does your brand impress you? Stop treating people like they’re dumb. If you aren’t impressed by your brand then your customers will feel the same. Don’t be so complacent. Competitors, new entrants and even new business models are waiting in the wings to take your place.

2. Just be yourself. You’re human, your customers are human and the people your customers talk to are human. Get back in touch with what it is to be human or super social apes. What makes people angry? What makes them happy? What do they find interesting? What do they care about? What do they talk about? How do they interact with other people?

3. Don’t always hide behind research. If you can’t find a big problem then make one. Challenge conventions and define new markets. Create a new meaning in your sector, be a leader and have the confidence to be intuitive.

4. Be more than just an image, have substance and style. What does your brand believe in? What is your brand enthusiastic about? Do things that prove it? You don’t need big budgets to be impressive. So watch you back

5. To be consistent, is to be the same, the same as everyone else. Consistency might make people feel safe, but it doesn’t impress. Mix it up from time to time. Be complex, be random and be unexpected. God forbid, be immeasurable. Don’t tie yourself down to one way of doing things. The only thing it does is hold you back and makes you vulnerable. Before you know it a challenger brand will be impressing your customers and all because you wanted to be ‘consistent and on message’.

6.Make things happen, be fluid and be light on your feet. Find your entrepreneurial spirit? Step out from behind the comfort of your processes and your media and research budgets. Find out what is it that you need to do to impress people and go out and do it.

7. There’s a world out there, of media that is. Don’t just sit there worrying about the ‘future of the media landscape’ – change it or make it work for your brand. Do what enhances your brand, not what everyone else is doing. People are impressed when brands do things differently.

8.Use the media available to you to construct and tell a story – make it work harder. Create a more fulfilling experience. Experiment with media and occasionally trust your brand in the hands of others, even your customers. You never know, they might do a better job than your agency. That will save you a few quid and impress your boss.

9.Let go. People will talk about your brand and there is nothing you can do about. Just embrace it and encourage participation. If you have done number four properly then you shouldn’t have anything to worry about. Should you? People will be impressed by brands with nothing to hide.

Twitter

My del.icio.us

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,192 other followers