What innovation means to a social scientist?

Eric Dishman, a social scientist at Intel (sounds pretty cool) talks about what innovation means to him. And unlike a lot in the brand business, it’s much biggger than using the latest gadget *moan* or social tool *whinge*. Have a looky and see how he changes the world of health care.

Eric also talks about the concept of interaction design, a skill I reckon would be good in a planning team.

Being a dickhead’s cool…and probably makes you money

Sometimes I think I’m in the wrong game. Why not just create some funny video, turn the theme tune into a ring tone and sell it on iTunes?

I hear there’s a lot of people on the Internet these days and I’m guessing this person has made some cash because of it. 2 million views and counting, a buck on iTunes. Who needs a life of serious brands and advertising?

Marketing as platforms and applications

I’ve always believed that the single easiest way to get your head round digital and more importantly the direction of communications and culture type stuff, is to simply look at the vocabulary being used by the people that do the doing, not the thinking. This post on Savage Minds highlights a potentially better way of looking at marketing by comparing the techy terms like platform to culture and application to subculture.

It makes sense when you think about. You don’t really manage a brand in neat little channels anymore. Like in John Grant’s book, The Brand Innovation Manifesto, brands are really defined by a bunch of complimentary associations and experiences. John calls these brand molecules, but it’s essentially the same. You should be creating a platform, with a series of applications that allow you to keep moving quickly and effectively. Much like Starbucks has done

Don’t get me wrong, we don’t need anymore marketing words, but we do need to use more helpful ones.

Twitter

My del.icio.us

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,081 other followers