<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The social network class divide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecommunicationsroom.com/2009/07/10/the-social-network-class-divide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecommunicationsroom.com/2009/07/10/the-social-network-class-divide/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from a communications thinker and tinkerer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 23:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlmoggy</title>
		<link>http://thecommunicationsroom.com/2009/07/10/the-social-network-class-divide/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carlmoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunicationsroom.com/?p=855#comment-238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s is a lot of limitations to most of these studies. I just see them as a bit of an indicator.

Cheers Bert]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s is a lot of limitations to most of these studies. I just see them as a bit of an indicator.</p>
<p>Cheers Bert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Maes</title>
		<link>http://thecommunicationsroom.com/2009/07/10/the-social-network-class-divide/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bert Maes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecommunicationsroom.com/?p=855#comment-237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very good, useful overview!

I&#039;ve been reading that:
 
- Facebook is for &#039;Generation Y&#039; (from the early 1980s to early 1990s)

- Whereas Twitter is very popular with &#039;Generation X&#039; (from the mid-1960s to late 1970s)

But when I read your text, this assumption isn&#039;t completely through, isn&#039;t it??

Bert
http://bertmaes.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very good, useful overview!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading that:</p>
<p>- Facebook is for &#8216;Generation Y&#8217; (from the early 1980s to early 1990s)</p>
<p>- Whereas Twitter is very popular with &#8216;Generation X&#8217; (from the mid-1960s to late 1970s)</p>
<p>But when I read your text, this assumption isn&#8217;t completely through, isn&#8217;t it??</p>
<p>Bert<br />
<a href="http://bertmaes.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://bertmaes.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

